1,111,111 TRP = 11,111 USD
1,111,111 TRP = 11,111 USD
1,111,111 TRP = 11,111 USD
Reset Your New Password Now!
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this memory should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Is PHP still a relevant language in 2017?
My humble opinion is yes, PHP is still very much a relevant language in 2017 and till this date which am writing this answer to respond your question. So if you're looking forward to build a beautiful and sweet looking website, then I will humbly advise you go with PHP. Thank you. :)
My humble opinion is yes, PHP is still very much a relevant language in 2017 and till this date which am writing this answer to respond your question.
So if you’re looking forward to build a beautiful and sweet looking website, then I will humbly advise you go with PHP. Thank you. đ
See lessHow did the world came into existence
Although no one can really explain how the world came into existence. Scientists are still trying to unravel one of the greatest mysteries of earth: When did "life" first appear and how did it happen? It is estimated that the first life forms on earth were primitive, one-celled creatures that appearUnfold thinking...
Although no one can really explain how the world came into existence. Scientists are still trying to unravel one of the greatest mysteries of earth: When did “life” first appear and how did it happen? It is estimated that the first life forms on earth were primitive, one-celled creatures that appeared about 3 billion years ago?
In the very beginning of earth’s history, this planet was a giant, red hot, roiling, boiling sea of molten rock – a magma ocean. The heat had been generated by the repeated high speed collisions of much smaller bodies of space rocks that continually clumped together as they collided to form this planet. As the collisions tapered off the earth began to cool, forming a thin crust on its surface. As the cooling continued, water vapor began to escape and condense in the earth’s early atmosphere. Clouds formed and storms raged, raining more and more water down on the primitive earth, cooling the surface further until it was flooded with water, forming the seas.
Anyway, you can watch this video to chill your mind somehow.
See lessBill Gates
The time, day, and date i discovered Bill Gates smoke weed was on 10:10 PM Saturday, November 16, 2019 Here is the link which i discovered at; https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-lists/50-most-successful-marijuana-enthusiasts-you-should-know-114790/ then i believed and validated all my ideaUnfold thinking...
The time, day, and date i discovered Bill Gates smoke weed was on 10:10 PM Saturday, November 16, 2019
Here is the link which i discovered at; https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-lists/50-most-successful-marijuana-enthusiasts-you-should-know-114790/ then i believed and validated all my ideas and visuals. I said to my self, if the richest man on earth is a weed smoker, then why can’t i be more than him.
Weed gave me the confidence to challenged him, and today he’s my friend “as in one-on-one” friends. Kill that sh!t.
If you’re reading this, then you’re a KING/QUEEN.
Not everybody will read this, and if you read this right up till this point, then you’re curious, you’re willing to know, you’re willing to discover.
THAT’S WHY I CALL YOU A KING OR QUEEN !!!!.
See lessBELIEVE IN YOURSELF FIRST, AND SEE HOW YOUR DREAMS UNFOLDS.
How to be successful
How to be successful you asked. Right? In a nutshell to be successful these (3) three things you must be ready to sacrifice them. 1. TIME 2. KNOWLEDGE 3. MONEY Now, in a case where you might not have all 3 at your disposal, that's where the use of a partner(s) comes in for. Example; is a business seUnfold thinking...
How to be successful you asked. Right? In a nutshell to be successful these (3) three things you must be ready to sacrifice them.
1. TIME
2. KNOWLEDGE
3. MONEY
Now, in a case where you might not have all 3 at your disposal, that’s where the use of a partner(s) comes in for.
Example; is a business sense of view.
You might have the KNOWLEDGE [Founder] , then you will need to partner with others who have TIME [Operator] and other who have the MONEY [Investor].
In a case, where you don’t have the means you attain above points, then you can always start here at the .IO Thinkle community by sharing the small knowledge you have in exchange for some rewards points, which you will therefore redeemed it for CASH.
See lessWhy are the British confused about us calling bread rolls âbiscuitsâ when they call bread rolls âpuddingsâ?
I have never heard a British person EVER call a bread roll a `pudding`. We DO have argumentsâŚ.mostly of a regional nature. I`ve heard bread rolls called both baps and barmcakes, for instance. But never, ever, a `pudding`. You are misinformed. Or perhaps you are confusing the term with something elseUnfold thinking...
I have never heard a British person EVER call a bread roll a `pudding`.
We DO have argumentsâŚ.mostly of a regional nature. I`ve heard bread rolls called both baps and barmcakes, for instance. But never, ever, a `pudding`. You are misinformed.
Or perhaps you are confusing the term with something elseâŚdessert, afters, or whatever you call the sweet course in the US.
I have many times had a nice scone for pudding. `Pudding `being a common ( if now dated) term used for the second course. It is not the name of the confectionary itself, though, but an indication that it follows the main, usually savoury, course.
See lessWhy are the British confused about us calling bread rolls âbiscuitsâ when they call bread rolls âpuddingsâ?
Most British people understand that the English and American English have drifted slightly away, so that we have different definitions of words. Now, to the British people who insists our naming is incorrect, they need to understand that our language is not the same. Please donât try to tell me thatUnfold thinking...
Most British people understand that the English and American English have drifted slightly away, so that we have different definitions of words.
Now, to the British people who insists our naming is incorrect, they need to understand that our language is not the same. Please donât try to tell me that we speak the same language, because in all honesty we donât. However, our languages are incredibly similar.
See lessIs this statement, âi see him last nightâ can be understood as âI saw him last nightâ?
You are correct that both are understandable. The only other possible everyday meaning I could think of would be âI see him [in my mindâs eye] last nightâ; that is, I am, at this very moment, imagining him last night. But it should almost always be clear from context which one is intended. âCorrectâUnfold thinking...
You are correct that both are understandable.
The only other possible everyday meaning I could think of would be âI see him [in my mindâs eye] last nightâ; that is, I am, at this very moment, imagining him last night. But it should almost always be clear from context which one is intended.
âCorrectâ doesnât mean âunderstandableâ, though. If I say âMe want have foodingâ itâs pretty clear what to understand from that, but itâs not anywhere near correct Standard English grammar. If you lived somewhere where you spoke a dialect of English in which this was acceptable grammar, however, then it would be correct for that dialect.
See lessIs this statement, âi see him last nightâ can be understood as âI saw him last nightâ?
Yes, I understand it. I hear a lot of this incorrect grammar from my wife. I would expect that the person that spoke this was possibly Chinese. In Chinese there are no tenses or plurals. No he or she pronouns. The context tells all. So it might have been a direct translation from Chinese.
Yes, I understand it. I hear a lot of this incorrect grammar from my wife. I would expect that the person that spoke this was possibly Chinese. In Chinese there are no tenses or plurals. No he or she pronouns. The context tells all. So it might have been a direct translation from Chinese.
See lessWhat is a nice way to end an interview that is clearly going badly?
You then have the option to elaborate if you feel so inclined and/or if the now-former candidate asks either with the literal truth or something generic like âI just donât think itâs a good fit.â I actually had someone do that to me in a face-to-face and thatâs how they worded it. It was supposed toUnfold thinking...
You then have the option to elaborate if you feel so inclined and/or if the now-former candidate asks either with the literal truth or something generic like âI just donât think itâs a good fit.â
I actually had someone do that to me in a face-to-face and thatâs how they worded it. It was supposed to be 3 steps in the interview and after 20 minutes they decided I wasnât suited for them*. I was actually grateful that they chose not to waste my time going through the motions.
See lessWhat is a nice way to end an interview that is clearly going badly?
Iâve also ended interviews as a candidate on the phone myself. They asked a question that I didnâtâ have the answer to and I told them that I didnât know. The next 2 questions were in that same direction, with them knowing that Iâd already said I wasnât particularly fluent in that area but they keptUnfold thinking...
Iâve also ended interviews as a candidate on the phone myself. They asked a question that I didnâtâ have the answer to and I told them that I didnât know. The next 2 questions were in that same direction, with them knowing that Iâd already said I wasnât particularly fluent in that area but they kept on. At that point I said, âLetâs just stop here. We both know that Iâm not doing well answering your questions and to be honest, that youâre restating the same topic after being told that already I donât know probably means we wouldnât be a good fit.â Too many people forget that itâs a two-way street and they seems shocked that anyone would actually end their interview.
See less