Do you believe the VAR has improved the integrity in officiating of matches
Share
1,111,111 TRP = 11,111 USD
1,111,111 TRP = 11,111 USD
1,111,111 TRP = 11,111 USD
Reset Your New Password Now!
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this memory should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Do you believe the VAR has improved the integrity in officiating of matches
Pros of VAR:
Reduced Human Error: VAR minimizes blatant mistakes (offside, penalties, red cards), ensuring fairness in critical decisions.
Transparency: Reviews allow fans and players to see evidence, fostering trust in contentious calls.
Consistency: Standardized protocols reduce referee subjectivity, aligning with FIFA’s integrity goals.
Cons of VAR:
Delays & Flow: Lengthy reviews disrupt match momentum, frustrating players and spectators.
Subjectivity Persists: Interpretations (e.g., “clear and obvious errors”) still spark debate, undermining perceived fairness.
Technology Limits: Marginal offside calls or frame-rate issues can create new controversies.